Should COVID-19 vaccines be mandated in schools? - an international caregiver perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Caregiver attitudes toward mandating COVID-19 vaccines for their children are poorly understood. We aimed to determine caregiver acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools/daycares and assess if opposition to mandates would result in removal of children from the educational system. STUDY DESIGN: Perform a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of adult caregivers with children ≤ 18 years presenting to 21 pediatric emergency departments in the United States, Canada, Israel, and Switzerland, November 1st through December 31st, 2021. The primary outcome was caregiver acceptance rates for school vaccine mandates, and the secondary outcomes included factors associated with mandate acceptance and caregiver intention to remove the child from school. RESULTS: Of 4,393 completed surveys, 37% of caregivers were opposed to any school vaccine mandate. Caregiver acceptance was lowest for daycare settings (33%) and increased as the child's level of education increased, college (55%). 26% of caregivers report a high likelihood (score of 8-10 on 0-10 scale) to remove their child from school if the vaccine became mandatory. Child safety was caregivers' greatest concern over vaccine mandates. A multivariable model demonstrated intent to vaccinate their child for COVID-19 (OR = 8.9, 95% CI 7.3 to 10.8; P < 0.001) and prior COVID-19 vaccination for the caregiver (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 3.0 to 4.9; P < 0.001) had the greatest odds of increasing mandate acceptance for any school level. CONCLUSIONS: Many caregivers are resistant to COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools, and acceptance varies with school level. One-fourth of caregivers plan to remove their child from the educational system if vaccines become mandated.

The responsibility to care: lessons learned from emergency department workers' perspectives during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

BACKGROUND: This study's objective was to examine emergency department (ED) workers' perspectives during the Canadian COVID-19 first wave. METHODS: This qualitative study included workers from nine Canadian EDs who participated in 3 monthly video focus groups between April and July 2020 to explore (1) personal/professional experiences, (2) patient care and ED work, (3) relationships with teams, institutions and governing bodies. Framework analysis informed data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-six focus groups and 15 interviews were conducted with 53 participants (including 24 physicians, 16 nurses). Median age was 37.5 years, 51% were female, 79% had more than 5 years' experience. Three main themes emerged. (1) Early in this pandemic, participants felt a responsibility to provide care to patients and solidarity toward their ED colleagues and team, while balancing many risks with their personal protection. (2) ED teams wanted to be engaged in decision-making, based on the best available scientific knowledge. Institutional decisions and clinical guidelines needed to be adapted to the specificity of each ED environment. (3) Working during the pandemic created new sources of moral distress and fatigue, including difficult clinical practices, distance with patients and families, frequent changes in information and added sources of fatigue. Although participants quickly adapted to a "new normal", they were concerned about long-term burnout. Participants who experienced high numbers of patient deaths felt especially unprepared. INTERPRETATION: ED workers believe they have a responsibility to provide care through a pandemic. Trust in leadership is supported by managers who are present and responsive, transparent in their communication, and involve ED staff in the development and practice of policies and procedures. Such practices will help protect from burnout and ensure the workforce's long-term sustainability.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Cette étude avait pour objectif d'examiner le point de vue des travailleurs des services d'urgence pendant la première vague de la COVID-19 au Canada. MéTHODES: Cette étude qualitative a inclus des travailleurs de neuf services d'urgence canadiens qui ont participé à 3 groupes de discussion monsuels par visioconférence entre avril et juillet 2020, pour explorer: (1) leurs expériences personnelles/professionnelles, (2) les soins aux patients et le travail au service d'urgence, (3) leurs relations avec les équipes, les institutions et instances dirigeantes. Le "framework analysis" a guidé le receuil et l'analyse des données. RéSULTATS: Trente-six groupes de discussion et 15 entretiens individuels ont été menés avec 53 participants (dont 24 médecins et 16 infirmières). L'âge médian était de 37,5 ans, 51% étaient des femmes, 79% avaient plus de 5 ans d'expérience. Trois thèmes principaux sont ressortis. (1) Au début de cette pandémie, les participants se sont sentis responsables de prodiguer des soins aux patients et solidaires envers leurs collègues et leurs équipes des urgences, tout en cherchant à équilibrer la gestion de nombreux risques et leur protection personnelle. (2) Les équipes des services d'urgence souhaitaient participer aux prises de décision, informées par les meilleures connaissances scientifiques disponibles. Les décisions institutionnelles et les lignes directrices cliniques doivent être adaptées à la spécificité de chaque salle d'urgence. (3) Travailler pendant la pandémie a créé de nouvelles sources de détresse morale et de fatigue, notamment des pratiques cliniques difficiles, la distance avec les patients et les familles, les changements fréquents d'information. Bien que les participants se soient rapidement adaptés à une « nouvelle normalité¼, ils étaient préoccupés par l'épuisement professionnel des travailleurs au long terme. Les participants qui ont vécu un nombre élevé de décès de patients à l'urgence se sentaient particulièrement mal préparés. INTERPRéTATION: Les travailleurs des services d'urgence estiment qu'ils ont la responsabilité de fournir des soins en cas de pandémie. Un sentiment de confiance dans les décideurs peut être soutenu par des gestionnaires qui sont présents et réactifs, transparents dans leur communication, et qui impliquent le personnel des services d'urgence dans le développement des politiques et procédures cliniques. De telles pratiques aideront à protéger contre l'épuisement professionnel pour garantir le bien-être des travailleurs d'urgence.

A survey of Canadian emergency physicians' experiences and perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to explore Canadian emergency physicians' experiences, concerns, and perspectives during the first wave of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of physician members of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada and the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians explored: personal safety/responsibility to care; patient interactions; ethical issues in pandemic care; institutional dynamics and communication practices. Data analysis was descriptive: categorical data were summarised with frequency distributions, continuous data [100 mm visual analog scales (VAS)] were analysed using measures of central tendency. Short open-ended items were coded to identify frequencies of responses. RESULTS: From June 29 to July 29, 2020, 187 respondents (13% response rate) completed the survey: 39% were from Ontario and 20% from Quebec, trained in general (50%) or pediatric (37%) emergency medicine. Respondents reported a high moral obligation to care for patients (97/100, IQR: 85-100, on 100 mm VAS). Fear of contracting COVID-19 changed how 82% of respondents reported interacting with patients, while 97% reported PPE negatively impacted patient care. Despite reporting a high proportion of negative emotions (84%), respondents (59%) were not/slightly concerned about their mental health. Top concerns included a potential second wave, Canada's financial situation, worldwide solidarity, and youth mental health. Facilitators to provide emergency care included: teamwork, leadership, clear communications strategies. CONCLUSION: Canadian emergency physicians felt a strong sense of responsibility to care, while dealing with several ethical dilemmas. Clear communication strategies, measures to ensure safety, and appropriate emergency department setups facilitate pandemic care. Emergency physicians were not concerned about their own mental health, requiring further exploration.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'objectif de cette étude était d'explorer les expériences, les préoccupations et les perspectives des médecins urgentistes canadiens pendant la première vague de la pandémie de coronavirus (COVID-19). MéTHODES: Cette enquête transversale auprès des médecins membres de Pediatric Emergency Research Canada et de l'Association canadienne des médecins d'urgence a permis d'explorer les aspects suivants : sécurité personnelle/responsabilité de soigner ; interactions avec les patients ; enjeux éthiques liés au soin en temps de pandémie ; dynamique institutionnelle et pratiques de communication. L'analyse des données était descriptive : les données catégorielles ont été résumées par des distributions de fréquence, les données continues [échelles visuelles analogiques (EVA) de 100 mm] ont été analysées à l'aide des indicateurs de tendance centrale. Les réponses ouvertes courtes ont été codées pour déterminer la fréquence des réponses. RéSULTATS: Du 29 juin au 29 juillet 2020, 187 répondants (taux de réponse de 13 %) ont répondu à l'enquête : 39 % provenaient de l'Ontario et 20 % du Québec, fet étaient formés en médecine d'urgence générale (50 %) ou pédiatrique (37 %). Les répondants ont rapporté une obligation morale élevée de s'occuper des patients (97/100, IQR : 85-100, sur une EVA de 100 mm). Quatre-vingt deux pourcent des répondants ont déclaré que la peur de contracter le COVID-19 avait modifié leurs intéractions avec les patients, tandis que, 97 % ont déclaré que l'EPI avait un impact négatif sur les soins aux patients. Bien qu'ils aient rapporté une forte proportion d'émotions négatives (84 %), les répondants (59 %) n'étaient pas/légèrement préoccupés par leur santé mentale. Parmi les principales préoccupations figuraient la possibilité d'une deuxième vague, la situation financière du Canada, la solidarité mondiale et la santé mentale des jeunes. Les facilitateurs chargés de fournir des soins d'urgence comprenaient : le travail d'équipe, le leadership et des stratégies de communication claires. CONCLUSION: Les médecins urgentistes canadiens ont ressenti un fort sentiment de responsabilité envers les soins, tout en faisant face à plusieurs dilemmes éthiques. Des stratégies de communication claires, des mesures visant à assurer la sécurité des professionnels d'urgence et une organisation appropriée des services d'urgence facilitent les soins en cas de pandémie. Les médecins urgentistes n'étaient pas préoccupés par leur propre santé mentale, ce qui mériterait une étude une étude plus approfondie.

Caregiver willingness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19: Cross sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: More than 100 COVID-19 vaccine candidates are in development since the SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequence was published in January 2020. The uptake of a COVID-19 vaccine among children will be instrumental in limiting the spread of the disease as herd immunity may require vaccine coverage of up to 80% of the population. Prior history of pandemic vaccine coverage was as low as 40% among children in the United States during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. PURPOSE: To investigate predictors associated with global caregivers' intent to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, when the vaccine becomes available. METHOD: An international cross sectional survey of 1541 caregivers arriving with their children to 16 pediatric Emergency Departments (ED) across six countries from March 26 to May 31, 2020. RESULTS: 65% (n = 1005) of caregivers reported that they intend to vaccinate their child against COVID-19, once a vaccine is available. A univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis found that increased intended uptake was associated with children that were older, children with no chronic illness, when fathers completed the survey, children up-to-date on their vaccination schedule, recent history of vaccination against influenza, and caregivers concerned their child had COVID-19 at the time of survey completion in the ED. The most common reason reported by caregivers intending to vaccinate was to protect their child (62%), and the most common reason reported by caregivers refusing vaccination was the vaccine's novelty (52%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of caregivers intend to vaccinate their children against COVID-19, though uptake will likely be associated with specific factors such as child and caregiver demographics and vaccination history. Public health strategies need to address barriers to uptake by providing evidence about an upcoming COVID-19 vaccine's safety and efficacy, highlighting the risks and consequences of infection in children, and educating caregivers on the role of vaccination.